Recently, after some internal conversations and comments I encountered on LinkedIn, I found myself reflecting on the common use of the term "resources" when talking about employees. In HR, it's a word that’s used often. When a project is in need of additional help or we have open roles to fill, we frequently refer to "allocating resources" or "finding resources." But when you step back and consider it, it’s a bit unsettling.
The dictionary defines resources as assets or things that are available for use. However, when we’re talking about people—whether they’re new hires or existing employees—they are so much more than just assets. They’re individuals with unique skills, talents, personalities, and experiences. Each person brings something special to the table that goes beyond the notion of a mere “resource.” We aren't just filling a role; we're bringing in real people who contribute on multiple levels, including personal connection, creative problem-solving, and cultural richness.
Imagine welcoming a new hire with, "Hi, new resource!" It doesn’t sound right, does it? Because it isn’t. Our colleagues are not resources; they’re human beings who are crucial to our team’s success. Each person deserves recognition as an individual, not as an interchangeable part of a machine.
Of course, HR stands for Human Resources, and the term has long been ingrained in our profession. But let’s remember that the "Human" part is essential, and it's the part that truly matters. Perhaps it’s time we shift our language to reflect that and focus more on the human aspect of what we do. Instead of referring to people as “resources,” let's celebrate the individual qualities that each new team member brings. This subtle change can reinforce a culture where people feel valued as individuals, not just as parts of a project or company.
As HR professionals, it’s our responsibility to lead by example. Let’s honor the unique contributions of each person we bring on board by treating them as people, not resources. After all, our teams deserve nothing less.
What are your thoughts on this?
Comments